<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Call for Web 2.0–Friendly Authoring Tools</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gryphonmountain.net/2008/06/call-for-web-20friendly-authoring-tools/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gryphonmountain.net/2008/06/call-for-web-20friendly-authoring-tools/</link>
	<description>Technical Communication and Other Writing Topics (by Ben Minson)</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon,  8 Mar 2010 23:39:18 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ben</title>
		<link>http://www.gryphonmountain.net/2008/06/call-for-web-20friendly-authoring-tools/comment-page-1/#comment-363</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 22:51:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gryphonmountain.net/?p=57#comment-363</guid>
		<description>Thanks, Vivek, for posting your answers. I believe I&#039;ll have some time to do some experimentation with the packager next week, and I&#039;m looking forward to seeing how well it works.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Vivek, for posting your answers. I believe I&#8217;ll have some time to do some experimentation with the packager next week, and I&#8217;m looking forward to seeing how well it works.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vivek Jain</title>
		<link>http://www.gryphonmountain.net/2008/06/call-for-web-20friendly-authoring-tools/comment-page-1/#comment-350</link>
		<dc:creator>Vivek Jain</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2008 07:34:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gryphonmountain.net/?p=57#comment-350</guid>
		<description>Hi Ben
Thanks for your insightful questions. It gives me an opportunity to clarify.  Please click here for details -  
http://blogs.adobe.com/techcomm/2008/06/online_help_as_adobe_air_overcoming_the_adoption_barrier.html
regards
Vivek</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Ben<br />
Thanks for your insightful questions. It gives me an opportunity to clarify.  Please click here for details &#8211;<br />
<a href="http://blogs.adobe.com/techcomm/2008/06/online_help_as_adobe_air_overcoming_the_adoption_barrier.html" rel="nofollow">http://blogs.adobe.com/techcomm/2008/06/online_help_as_adobe_air_overcoming_the_adoption_barrier.html</a><br />
regards<br />
Vivek</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben</title>
		<link>http://www.gryphonmountain.net/2008/06/call-for-web-20friendly-authoring-tools/comment-page-1/#comment-348</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2008 22:17:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gryphonmountain.net/?p=57#comment-348</guid>
		<description>Vivek, thanks for your suggestion. It has gotten me thinking about AIR again. I read about the RH Packager when beta 1 was announced. Originally, the biggest hang-up for me was the fact that users have to install something in order to view AIR help. If I convert my existing help systems to AIR, then what happens when users of those systems suddenly have to install something? I expect that some people, having to install AIR in order to view a help system, are going to ask themselves, &quot;Am I going to have to do this every time?&quot; (I&#039;m told that the AIR install message does not tell the user that this is the only time he&#039;ll ever have to install it on his computer.) Being the pessimistic creatures that many of us are, I imagine that many of the people who wonder if they&#039;ll always have to install an application before viewing the help will convince themselves that the answer is &quot;Yes.&quot; So they&#039;ll be that much more reluctant to view help.

Many of the users of the projects I work on fall into the baby boomer category, and a lot of those use a computer because it&#039;s necessary to get their jobs done. An extra step like installing something in order to view help will discourage people further from viewing help. They aren&#039;t going to intuitively understand that it&#039;s a one-time, easy-as-pie installation. And it would be difficult to get the word out to people using our systems (or who will use them in the future) that they have to install AIR just once.

On the Adobe Labs site, AIR is compared to Flash Player. My suggestion is that Adobe could talk to Microsoft and other companies about shipping AIR with their operating systems like they do Flash Player. Then people won&#039;t have to worry about an extra installation.

I have some questions that perhaps you could clear up for me:

1.  When will CSH be included? This is a deal-breaker for me because half the help systems I do are context-sensitive. And if I&#039;m going to go with AIR help, I want to use it for all my projects, not half.

2.  From what I&#039;ve read, it&#039;s not clear to me whether the AIR-packaged help is installed on or saved to a user&#039;s hard drive. The description of the auto-update feature talks about going out to a central location and getting updates. What happens if your help system goes with a Web application and doesn&#039;t need to be installed on users&#039; machines like a CHM is? Is it enough to have the AIR help file stored on a server only? Could the version on the server be configured to access a computer for updates? 

3.  In order to share comments, do reviewers have to email them? Are comments not saved as part of the AIR help so that I could open up my production help system and see people&#039;s comments?

I hope you can answer here for reference of any readers wondering about RH Packager. If not, I&#039;ll try the forum on the Labs. Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Vivek, thanks for your suggestion. It has gotten me thinking about AIR again. I read about the RH Packager when beta 1 was announced. Originally, the biggest hang-up for me was the fact that users have to install something in order to view AIR help. If I convert my existing help systems to AIR, then what happens when users of those systems suddenly have to install something? I expect that some people, having to install AIR in order to view a help system, are going to ask themselves, &#8220;Am I going to have to do this every time?&#8221; (I&#8217;m told that the AIR install message does not tell the user that this is the only time he&#8217;ll ever have to install it on his computer.) Being the pessimistic creatures that many of us are, I imagine that many of the people who wonder if they&#8217;ll always have to install an application before viewing the help will convince themselves that the answer is &#8220;Yes.&#8221; So they&#8217;ll be that much more reluctant to view help.</p>
<p>Many of the users of the projects I work on fall into the baby boomer category, and a lot of those use a computer because it&#8217;s necessary to get their jobs done. An extra step like installing something in order to view help will discourage people further from viewing help. They aren&#8217;t going to intuitively understand that it&#8217;s a one-time, easy-as-pie installation. And it would be difficult to get the word out to people using our systems (or who will use them in the future) that they have to install AIR just once.</p>
<p>On the Adobe Labs site, AIR is compared to Flash Player. My suggestion is that Adobe could talk to Microsoft and other companies about shipping AIR with their operating systems like they do Flash Player. Then people won&#8217;t have to worry about an extra installation.</p>
<p>I have some questions that perhaps you could clear up for me:</p>
<p>1.  When will CSH be included? This is a deal-breaker for me because half the help systems I do are context-sensitive. And if I&#8217;m going to go with AIR help, I want to use it for all my projects, not half.</p>
<p>2.  From what I&#8217;ve read, it&#8217;s not clear to me whether the AIR-packaged help is installed on or saved to a user&#8217;s hard drive. The description of the auto-update feature talks about going out to a central location and getting updates. What happens if your help system goes with a Web application and doesn&#8217;t need to be installed on users&#8217; machines like a CHM is? Is it enough to have the AIR help file stored on a server only? Could the version on the server be configured to access a computer for updates? </p>
<p>3.  In order to share comments, do reviewers have to email them? Are comments not saved as part of the AIR help so that I could open up my production help system and see people&#8217;s comments?</p>
<p>I hope you can answer here for reference of any readers wondering about RH Packager. If not, I&#8217;ll try the forum on the Labs. Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vivek Jain</title>
		<link>http://www.gryphonmountain.net/2008/06/call-for-web-20friendly-authoring-tools/comment-page-1/#comment-339</link>
		<dc:creator>Vivek Jain</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2008 05:37:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gryphonmountain.net/?p=57#comment-339</guid>
		<description>I am not sure if you have looked at RoboHelp Packager for Adobe AIR.  It enables end users to add comments on online help, export that as an XML file and share it with others.   You can use the same functionality for enabling a review with your developers or SMEs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am not sure if you have looked at RoboHelp Packager for Adobe AIR.  It enables end users to add comments on online help, export that as an XML file and share it with others.   You can use the same functionality for enabling a review with your developers or SMEs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kranny</title>
		<link>http://www.gryphonmountain.net/2008/06/call-for-web-20friendly-authoring-tools/comment-page-1/#comment-277</link>
		<dc:creator>Kranny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2008 06:19:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gryphonmountain.net/?p=57#comment-277</guid>
		<description>Hi Ben..i followed This blog from www.idratherbewriting.com..
Pretty nice Article ...Keep up the gud work..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Ben..i followed This blog from <a href="http://www.idratherbewriting.com." rel="nofollow">http://www.idratherbewriting.com.</a>.<br />
Pretty nice Article &#8230;Keep up the gud work..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
