<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Style Guides: Love Them or Hate Them?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gryphonmountain.net/2008/07/style-guides-love-them-or-hate-them/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gryphonmountain.net/2008/07/style-guides-love-them-or-hate-them/</link>
	<description>Technical Communication and Other Writing Topics, by Ben Minson</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2012 04:05:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Every writer should keep a style guide handy &#124; Iain Broome</title>
		<link>http://www.gryphonmountain.net/2008/07/style-guides-love-them-or-hate-them/#comment-136</link>
		<dc:creator>Every writer should keep a style guide handy &#124; Iain Broome</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 14:06:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gryphonmountain.net/?p=76#comment-136</guid>
		<description>[...] Style Guides: Love Them or Hate Them? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Style Guides: Love Them or Hate Them? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Susan</title>
		<link>http://www.gryphonmountain.net/2008/07/style-guides-love-them-or-hate-them/#comment-135</link>
		<dc:creator>Susan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jul 2008 16:48:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gryphonmountain.net/?p=76#comment-135</guid>
		<description>For the most part, I agree that style guides provide good guidelines for consistency, clarity, familiarity, and order.

I could think of a few examples in which styles can get in the way of friendliness.

1) legal implications -- words/phrases we&#039;re not allowed to use because of legal implications.  Work around would be to break another rule or be very wordy

2) fancy words/terminologies for marketing sake -- the other day, I had a discussion with a colleague regarding the way we refer to specific items both internally as well as in documentation. We create fancy words to distinguish our product from other products. It&#039;s all about &quot;branding.&quot; So my question is whether end-users really understand our language or that they&#039;d prefer simpler more familiar language   For example: &quot;input/output&quot; are simple terms. We use &quot;controls/indicators&quot; instead.  I end up writing something like &quot;wire the aaa control of xxx to the bbb indicator of yyy. Then wire the ccc controls of yyy to the ddd indicator of zzz.&quot;

3) Passive voice -- generally technical documentation should steer as far away from passive voice as possible. But occasionally, I wonder whether we need to turn a simple sentence to a lengthy paragraph just to explain who did the action. Examples: &quot;expected values&quot;  &quot;... as shown in the following figure.&quot;

Anyway . . . I agree with you that style guides are good. They&#039;re just annoying sometimes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For the most part, I agree that style guides provide good guidelines for consistency, clarity, familiarity, and order.</p>
<p>I could think of a few examples in which styles can get in the way of friendliness.</p>
<p>1) legal implications &#8212; words/phrases we&#8217;re not allowed to use because of legal implications.  Work around would be to break another rule or be very wordy</p>
<p>2) fancy words/terminologies for marketing sake &#8212; the other day, I had a discussion with a colleague regarding the way we refer to specific items both internally as well as in documentation. We create fancy words to distinguish our product from other products. It&#8217;s all about &#8220;branding.&#8221; So my question is whether end-users really understand our language or that they&#8217;d prefer simpler more familiar language   For example: &#8220;input/output&#8221; are simple terms. We use &#8220;controls/indicators&#8221; instead.  I end up writing something like &#8220;wire the aaa control of xxx to the bbb indicator of yyy. Then wire the ccc controls of yyy to the ddd indicator of zzz.&#8221;</p>
<p>3) Passive voice &#8212; generally technical documentation should steer as far away from passive voice as possible. But occasionally, I wonder whether we need to turn a simple sentence to a lengthy paragraph just to explain who did the action. Examples: &#8220;expected values&#8221;  &#8220;&#8230; as shown in the following figure.&#8221;</p>
<p>Anyway . . . I agree with you that style guides are good. They&#8217;re just annoying sometimes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben</title>
		<link>http://www.gryphonmountain.net/2008/07/style-guides-love-them-or-hate-them/#comment-134</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2008 23:43:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gryphonmountain.net/?p=76#comment-134</guid>
		<description>Gwen,

Lucky. If I could write the style guide, I&#039;d feel like the king. :) As we&#039;ve talked about style in our team, it&#039;s reminded me of how thorough they can be. Our organization&#039;s style guide is fairly extensive, and we&#039;re also supposed to use the Chicago Manual of Style for anything not specifically set out in the guide. But we discuss things sometimes that aren&#039;t covered. Some style guides can be brief and cover only a few usage choices and branding, but others can really get down to the nitty-gritty and have a prescription for everything (perhaps like the one Susan mentioned...). I hope yours isn&#039;t a major project all on its own.

Susan,

&quot;User-friendly&quot; is a very broad term. So in some cases, a style guide can enhance user-friendliness because it provides consistency. Consistency breeds familiarity, which in turn breeds friendship, and we&#039;re talking about our products being friends with the users, right? (Just playing on words here...) Do you have any specific instances of style getting in the way of friendliness?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gwen,</p>
<p>Lucky. If I could write the style guide, I&#8217;d feel like the king. <img src='http://www.gryphonmountain.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  As we&#8217;ve talked about style in our team, it&#8217;s reminded me of how thorough they can be. Our organization&#8217;s style guide is fairly extensive, and we&#8217;re also supposed to use the Chicago Manual of Style for anything not specifically set out in the guide. But we discuss things sometimes that aren&#8217;t covered. Some style guides can be brief and cover only a few usage choices and branding, but others can really get down to the nitty-gritty and have a prescription for everything (perhaps like the one Susan mentioned&#8230;). I hope yours isn&#8217;t a major project all on its own.</p>
<p>Susan,</p>
<p>&#8220;User-friendly&#8221; is a very broad term. So in some cases, a style guide can enhance user-friendliness because it provides consistency. Consistency breeds familiarity, which in turn breeds friendship, and we&#8217;re talking about our products being friends with the users, right? (Just playing on words here&#8230;) Do you have any specific instances of style getting in the way of friendliness?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Susan</title>
		<link>http://www.gryphonmountain.net/2008/07/style-guides-love-them-or-hate-them/#comment-133</link>
		<dc:creator>Susan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2008 15:31:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gryphonmountain.net/?p=76#comment-133</guid>
		<description>Learning about company style guide is like &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.shanghaitechwriter.com/2008/06/17/what-language-is-this/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt; learning a whole new language&lt;/a&gt;!  My company has a very lengthy style guide because we have hundreds of products with documentation written by many technical writers.

While having a style guide brings a certain order and professionalism to documentation, I wonder whether style guides sometimes get in the way of writing user-friendly documentation.  What do you think?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Learning about company style guide is like <a href="http://www.shanghaitechwriter.com/2008/06/17/what-language-is-this/" rel="nofollow"> learning a whole new language</a>!  My company has a very lengthy style guide because we have hundreds of products with documentation written by many technical writers.</p>
<p>While having a style guide brings a certain order and professionalism to documentation, I wonder whether style guides sometimes get in the way of writing user-friendly documentation.  What do you think?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gwen</title>
		<link>http://www.gryphonmountain.net/2008/07/style-guides-love-them-or-hate-them/#comment-132</link>
		<dc:creator>Gwen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2008 15:25:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gryphonmountain.net/?p=76#comment-132</guid>
		<description>I enjoyed reading this post. I&#039;m in the process of setting up such a style guide for an intranet portal and associated documentation.

Not only does following a style guide make the site look more professional, but it makes updating the content easier.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I enjoyed reading this post. I&#8217;m in the process of setting up such a style guide for an intranet portal and associated documentation.</p>
<p>Not only does following a style guide make the site look more professional, but it makes updating the content easier.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

