<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Review of Adobe RoboHelp 8: Improvements</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gryphonmountain.net/2009/03/review-of-adobe-robohelp-8-improvements/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gryphonmountain.net/2009/03/review-of-adobe-robohelp-8-improvements/</link>
	<description>Technical Communication and Other Writing Topics (by Ben Minson)</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 05:26:49 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ben</title>
		<link>http://www.gryphonmountain.net/2009/03/review-of-adobe-robohelp-8-improvements/comment-page-1/#comment-21238</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 14:02:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gryphonmountain.net/?p=352#comment-21238</guid>
		<description>Troy, good point. Dreamweaver does seem more current in HTML authoring standards. In RH, you can specify an external HTML editor, and I know that some people do use Dreamweaver. Perhaps the fact that Adobe hasn&#039;t more closely integrated the two is due partly to the fact that they picked up a bunch of products from Macromedia and are gradually settling into what they want to do with any redundancies.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Troy, good point. Dreamweaver does seem more current in HTML authoring standards. In RH, you can specify an external HTML editor, and I know that some people do use Dreamweaver. Perhaps the fact that Adobe hasn&#8217;t more closely integrated the two is due partly to the fact that they picked up a bunch of products from Macromedia and are gradually settling into what they want to do with any redundancies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Troy</title>
		<link>http://www.gryphonmountain.net/2009/03/review-of-adobe-robohelp-8-improvements/comment-page-1/#comment-21207</link>
		<dc:creator>Troy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 06:27:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gryphonmountain.net/?p=352#comment-21207</guid>
		<description>Since Macromedia and then Adobe became responsible for RoboHelp, I&#039;ve wondered why RH doesn&#039;t become a Dreamweaver extension. It seems to me that DW and RH share many of the same features, so why couldn&#039;t Adobe simply use DW as their web authoring product, and then offer RH as a paid extension for DW?

RoboHelp is so frustrating at times, I&#039;d rather use DW for all coding and then use RH for single-source output, indexing, localization, etc. -- all the things that makes RH great. RH still seems like an after-though for Adobe.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since Macromedia and then Adobe became responsible for RoboHelp, I&#8217;ve wondered why RH doesn&#8217;t become a Dreamweaver extension. It seems to me that DW and RH share many of the same features, so why couldn&#8217;t Adobe simply use DW as their web authoring product, and then offer RH as a paid extension for DW?</p>
<p>RoboHelp is so frustrating at times, I&#8217;d rather use DW for all coding and then use RH for single-source output, indexing, localization, etc. &#8212; all the things that makes RH great. RH still seems like an after-though for Adobe.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
