<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Five Skills for Managing Documentation Projects in an Agile Environment</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gryphonmountain.net/2009/11/five-skills-for-managing-documentation-projects-in-an-agile-environment/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gryphonmountain.net/2009/11/five-skills-for-managing-documentation-projects-in-an-agile-environment/</link>
	<description>Technical Communication and Other Writing Topics, by Ben Minson</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2012 04:05:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben</title>
		<link>http://www.gryphonmountain.net/2009/11/five-skills-for-managing-documentation-projects-in-an-agile-environment/#comment-422</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 16:35:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gryphonmountain.net/?p=785#comment-422</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the comments.

@Bill: I think that communicating with the customer often and well could be skill #6, and just like with the product, you show the customer and make sure you&#039;re on the right track so that any course corrections are small.

@Larry: I think the other side of what you said is that if you&#039;re writing in small pieces and then the plan changes, you may not have to throw away as much previous work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the comments.</p>
<p>@Bill: I think that communicating with the customer often and well could be skill #6, and just like with the product, you show the customer and make sure you&#8217;re on the right track so that any course corrections are small.</p>
<p>@Larry: I think the other side of what you said is that if you&#8217;re writing in small pieces and then the plan changes, you may not have to throw away as much previous work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Larry Kunz</title>
		<link>http://www.gryphonmountain.net/2009/11/five-skills-for-managing-documentation-projects-in-an-agile-environment/#comment-421</link>
		<dc:creator>Larry Kunz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 18:58:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gryphonmountain.net/?p=785#comment-421</guid>
		<description>Good ideas, Ben.

There&#039;s another reason for topic-based writing. In addition to scope creep, plan changes can mean that the team has to throw out a whole bunch of  documentation they&#039;ve already written. If the team has been using topic-based writing, they&#039;ll probably still be able to use some of the topics rather than having to start over from scratch.

And yes, &quot;topic-based writing&quot; is the right term -- not necessarily &quot;DITA.&quot; DITA is a great set of tools for doing topic-based writing. But not all topic-based (or modular, or reuseable) writing has to be DITA.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good ideas, Ben.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s another reason for topic-based writing. In addition to scope creep, plan changes can mean that the team has to throw out a whole bunch of  documentation they&#8217;ve already written. If the team has been using topic-based writing, they&#8217;ll probably still be able to use some of the topics rather than having to start over from scratch.</p>
<p>And yes, &#8220;topic-based writing&#8221; is the right term &#8212; not necessarily &#8220;DITA.&#8221; DITA is a great set of tools for doing topic-based writing. But not all topic-based (or modular, or reuseable) writing has to be DITA.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Albing</title>
		<link>http://www.gryphonmountain.net/2009/11/five-skills-for-managing-documentation-projects-in-an-agile-environment/#comment-420</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Albing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 14:34:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gryphonmountain.net/?p=785#comment-420</guid>
		<description>I agree - small chunks or topics is better. In fact, when in Agile-land, do as the Agile-ers do. If they are developing small chunks of functionality, then only develop the documentation needed for that. I don&#039;t think tech writers or anyone creating user documentation should work in a way that is different from the others on the project: if the team is using Agile principles, then you should too. If the team is doing traditional project management (with planning and estimating up front) then you should do that too. A big part of Agile is communication and collaboration with the customer -- develop a little and then show the customer. So with the docs, develop a little and get some feedback about what they like or don&#039;t like, and then go from there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree &#8211; small chunks or topics is better. In fact, when in Agile-land, do as the Agile-ers do. If they are developing small chunks of functionality, then only develop the documentation needed for that. I don&#8217;t think tech writers or anyone creating user documentation should work in a way that is different from the others on the project: if the team is using Agile principles, then you should too. If the team is doing traditional project management (with planning and estimating up front) then you should do that too. A big part of Agile is communication and collaboration with the customer &#8212; develop a little and then show the customer. So with the docs, develop a little and get some feedback about what they like or don&#8217;t like, and then go from there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

